Levant Time logo

Articles

News feature image
Today's Essential

Sisi Stresses the Defensive Nature of Support for Riyadh

Egypt condemns Turkish-Libyan maritime agreement that threatens its sovereign rights
Author portrait
By LevantTime .
Published Oct 22, 2026 - 00:02
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi stressed on Wednesday that the military support offered to his Saudi ally against Yemen's pro-Iranian Houthis was strictly defensive, saying no attack on Yemen was planned. “The aim is to defend the kingdom's territory and borders, as well as those of any other Arab state, if Egypt is asked to do so,” the president said in a speech, as Tehran issued a warning to Cairo. Any military involvement would mark a break with Egypt's cautious diplomacy, which in recent years has prioritized safeguarding its own national security. But Riyadh, which has also received pledges of defensive support from France and the United Kingdom, has long been a key ally of Cairo.
Analyze
Author portrait
By Mona Fayad - Published Oct 21, 2026 - 20:27
News feature image
Photo: ANWAR AMRO/AFP
How did Lebanon reach such a state of deterioration, to the point of collapse? What prevents the state from exercising its sovereign prerogatives, including its monopoly on violence, its authority to decide on war and peace, and its right to pursue a foreign policy consistent with its interests? Anyone who critically and impartially examines the first century of the Lebanese state’s existence will find that the ruling political class has behaved in a peculiar manner from independence to the present day. Although the founding fathers of Greater Lebanon sought to strengthen the concepts of citizenship, loyalty to the homeland, and the right to self-determination, the practices of political leaders ultimately led to the “confiscation of citizenship” and the weakening of national loyalty, to the point of its complete disappearance among some, in favor of sectarian leaders, powerful families, and foreign allegiances.
Economy
Author portrait
By Bernard Raymond Jabre - Published Oct 21, 2026 - 17:55
News feature image
A burning police vehicle lies on its side on the A20 motorway, spewing thick black smoke and flames during protests on October 17, 2026. (AFP)
France is no longer facing merely a budget crisis, a political crisis, a social crisis or a crisis of authority. The real danger emerges when these crises, which until now have been relatively distinct, begin to converge, interact and feed off one another. That is when a succession of crises can become a systemic crisis of the state. This is not a prediction of France’s collapse. The state remains powerful, public administration continues to function, institutions are holding firm and the French economy remains substantial. But a deeper question arises: can a state remain fully sovereign as it gradually loses its ability to make decisions, fund them, secure public acceptance and put them into effect?
More Articles
Sort By: NewestOldest
From Rome to the Third Republic: Has Lebanon’s Refoundation Begun?

History does not remember only the cities where wars came to an end. It remembers the cities where new political orders were born. That is why Rome may one day be remembered not merely as the city that hosted another round of negotiations between Lebanon and Israel, but as the place where the process of reshaping Lebanon’s political and security architecture began after a war that profoundly altered the regional balance of power. The meetings scheduled in Rome are about far more than a ceasefire, an Israeli withdrawal, or a prisoner exchange, important as those issues undoubtedly are. They form part of a broader process aimed at translating the outcome of the war into a new political reality capable of preventing any return to the pre-war status quo.

Iran: Despite Their "Differences", Trump and Netanyahu Close Ranks

US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a meeting on Tuesday that both sides described as "positive," reaffirming their shared commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The two leaders, who have stood shoulder to shoulder in their campaign against the Islamic Republic, have nonetheless begun showing signs of divergence since last April. The White House occupant now favors a diplomatic solution to cut short a war that has dragged on longer than expected and risks becoming a political liability as the midterm elections approach. Conversely, the Israeli Prime Minister intends to see the confrontation through to the end in order to eliminate what he describes as the "existential" threat posed by Iran.

The Impact of a Ukrainian or Russian Victory (4/5)
By
Jean-Patrick Dayras
Published

The war in Ukraine continues to be at the center of a wide-ranging debate, fueled in part by near-daily bombardments targeting key nerve centers on both sides, and more specifically the Russian and Ukrainian capitals. In order to better understand the various dimensions of this long-standing conflict, it is necessary to revisit the background and origins of what led to this (fratricidal?) war – by examining the motivations and aspirations of the different parties involved, including the West (the United States and Europe, extended to all NATO member states with the exception of Turkey), and by also recalling the early stages of the Russian offensive and the failed attempts to reach peace, or at least to open negotiations, bearing in mind that responsibility in this context is shared by many.

Saudi Arabia Targets Pro-Iranian Militias in Iraq
By
Taline Becharraoui
Published

While tensions have largely subsided in the Middle East regarding the Iranian conflict, it is the Yemeni front that appears most active this Monday, July 27, with new Houthi rebel attacks on oil facilities in Saudi Arabia. In this context, the Saudi kingdom is currently being targeted by other pro-Iranian groups based in Iraq. The Saudis intercepted drones launched from Iraqi territory and, at the same time, called on Iraqi authorities to prevent such attacks carried out by these 'terrorist' groups — all the more so as the new government has expressed its willingness to better manage its internal situation.

Hamas: The al-Hayya Era
By
Hisham Dibsi
Published

Over the course of three decades, Hamas evolved from the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood into an armed resistance movement at the end of 1987, before becoming the governing authority in the Gaza Strip following its takeover from the Palestinian Authority in 2007. From that point onward, Hamas ceased to be merely another Palestinian faction. It is true that the movement had come to power through democratic and peaceful elections, with Ismail Haniyeh serving as Prime Minister of the Palestinian National Authority. Yet the bloody takeover, which claimed the lives of more than 120 members of the security forces and Fatah, as well as 39 civilians during five days of fierce attacks on Palestinian Authority institutions and the arrest of dozens of their personnel, according to reports by the International Committee of the Red Cross, fundamentally altered the political landscape.

Hezbollah-Israel: An Endless War in Whose Interests? (13)

This series of articles aims to provide a clearer understanding of the current situation on the Lebanese political scene in light of the past, free from passionate, ideological, or romanticized narratives that miss the underlying realities, leaving readers to draw their own conclusions. The previous twelve installments offered a reexamination of the events surrounding Hezbollah's rise to power, from the Taif Agreement through the deeply flawed implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 in 2006. Two years before the 33-day war of 2006, and more specifically on September 3, 2004, under direct pressure from Bashar al-Assad's Syria, the Lebanese Parliament extended President Émile Lahoud's term by three years.