Levant Time logo

Articles

News feature image
Today's Essential

Sisi Stresses the Defensive Nature of Support for Riyadh

Egypt condemns Turkish-Libyan maritime agreement that threatens its sovereign rights
Author portrait
By LevantTime .
Published Oct 22, 2026 - 00:02
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi stressed on Wednesday that the military support offered to his Saudi ally against Yemen's pro-Iranian Houthis was strictly defensive, saying no attack on Yemen was planned. “The aim is to defend the kingdom's territory and borders, as well as those of any other Arab state, if Egypt is asked to do so,” the president said in a speech, as Tehran issued a warning to Cairo. Any military involvement would mark a break with Egypt's cautious diplomacy, which in recent years has prioritized safeguarding its own national security. But Riyadh, which has also received pledges of defensive support from France and the United Kingdom, has long been a key ally of Cairo.
Analyze
Author portrait
By Mona Fayad - Published Oct 21, 2026 - 20:27
News feature image
Photo: ANWAR AMRO/AFP
How did Lebanon reach such a state of deterioration, to the point of collapse? What prevents the state from exercising its sovereign prerogatives, including its monopoly on violence, its authority to decide on war and peace, and its right to pursue a foreign policy consistent with its interests? Anyone who critically and impartially examines the first century of the Lebanese state’s existence will find that the ruling political class has behaved in a peculiar manner from independence to the present day. Although the founding fathers of Greater Lebanon sought to strengthen the concepts of citizenship, loyalty to the homeland, and the right to self-determination, the practices of political leaders ultimately led to the “confiscation of citizenship” and the weakening of national loyalty, to the point of its complete disappearance among some, in favor of sectarian leaders, powerful families, and foreign allegiances.
Economy
Author portrait
By Bernard Raymond Jabre - Published Oct 21, 2026 - 17:55
News feature image
A burning police vehicle lies on its side on the A20 motorway, spewing thick black smoke and flames during protests on October 17, 2026. (AFP)
France is no longer facing merely a budget crisis, a political crisis, a social crisis or a crisis of authority. The real danger emerges when these crises, which until now have been relatively distinct, begin to converge, interact and feed off one another. That is when a succession of crises can become a systemic crisis of the state. This is not a prediction of France’s collapse. The state remains powerful, public administration continues to function, institutions are holding firm and the French economy remains substantial. But a deeper question arises: can a state remain fully sovereign as it gradually loses its ability to make decisions, fund them, secure public acceptance and put them into effect?
More Articles
Sort By: NewestOldest
The “Theological Locus” of Ecclesial Movements (2/2)

On May 29, at the initiative of the Focolare Movement, 35 representatives of and members from various ecclesial movements gathered to speak publicly about their distinctive identities and mission. Addressing the gathering in the Cathedral of the Resurrection, Jean Barbara, former president of Charis and now president of a network of communities grouped under the banner Sword of the Spirit (“the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,” Ephesians 6:17), presented Cardinal Josef Ratzinger’s understanding of ecclesial movements. He cited a little-known text written in 1998 by the future pope, then prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, at the request of John Paul II. Entitled The Theological Place of Ecclesial Movements , it describes the movements as a “theological locus” complementing the parish.

Timeline of ceasefires after the 40-day war in Iran

After forty days of war between the United States and Israel on one side and Iran on the other, along with simultaneous fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon, a preliminary ceasefire framework agreement between Washington and Tehran came into effect on April 8, 2026. A few hours later, a series of massive Israeli air operations struck more than thirty Hezbollah positions in Lebanon within ten minutes, killing over 300 people and wounding 1,150 others — among the deadliest strikes of the conflict — as the Israeli air force dropped precisely 160 bombs. The American-Iranian agreement, initially set to last fifteen days and not covering Lebanon, was extended indefinitely on April 21. In addition to halting hostilities between the two parties, it provided for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the start of diplomatic talks.

Uncertainty Clouds Resumption of U.S.-Iran Talks in Doha

Has the uncertainty surrounding the long-announced resumption of U.S.-Iran talks in Doha over the past two days brought negotiations back to square one? Probably not, though it’s a fair question to ask. The picture is more nuanced, but the road ahead is far from easy. Tehran and Washington seem reluctant to make any further concessions beyond those already made under the memorandum of understanding they signed on June 18. While Doha is expected to host U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner today, alongside an Iranian technical delegation that will be joined on Wednesday by Iran’s deputy foreign minister for legal and international affairs, Kazem Gharibabadi, Qatari officials say that no direct high-level meeting with Iranian officials has been scheduled for now.

From War to Statehood
By
Yakzan Takki
Published

The significance of the proposed framework agreement between Lebanon and Israel lies not merely in its aim of bringing a military confrontation to an end. More profoundly, it reflects a fundamental shift in the nature of postwar agreements. The document bears little resemblance to traditional ceasefire accords, nor does it confine itself to regulating lines of contact or withdrawal arrangements. Instead, it lays the foundations for a new model of conflict settlement, one in which state-building becomes an integral part of peace-building, and sovereignty assumes a renewed meaning, far more complex than the mere protection of borders.

The List of Shame
By
Hisham Dibsi
Published

In 2005, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1612, providing for the identification of parties responsible for grave violations against children in armed conflicts and wars, whether they are states or de facto authorities such as militias and illegitimate local powers. Pursuant to this resolution, the “List of Shame” is issued annually, ranking states and organizations according to the number and nature of the violations they commit. The annual report reveals that armed and security forces committed 38,000 violations against children worldwide over the past year. It covers sixteen countries, most notably Afghanistan, Mali, Haiti, Myanmar, Somalia, Nigeria, Sudan, Iran and Israel.

From Iraq to Lebanon, the battle for the monopoly on weapons has begun

Uncertainty persisted at the start of the week over when technical talks between Tehran and Washington would resume, after both sides agreed last Tuesday in Switzerland to establish four working groups dedicated to sanctions relief, nuclear issues, and reconstruction. Strained by the military standoff over the Strait of Hormuz — where Iran is seeking to impose total control — and Tehran's refusal to allow IAEA inspectors access to its nuclear sites, talks between the two capitals have nonetheless not broken down, according to multiple corroborating sources cited by AFP and American media outlets.