Levant Time logo

Articles

News feature image
With less than three months remaining before António Guterres’s term ends on 31 December 2026, the race to succeed him is increasingly shaped by veto threats and Washington’s drive to fundamentally transform the United Nations. (Marco Longari / AFP)
Politics
Author portrait
By LevantTime .
Published Oct 20, 2026 - 19:52
Sylviane Zehil, New York The first color-coded ballot, held at the Security Council on 16 October, exposed the major powers’ opposition to the three frontrunners in the race to succeed António Guterres. None can now be sure of clearing the veto hurdle. With less than three months remaining before the deadline, diplomatic maneuvering is intensifying as the Trump administration seeks to influence the choice of a secretary-general capable of bringing about far-reaching change at the United Nations. In New York, the race to succeed António Guterres has reached a decisive turning point. The red ballots have spoken but have not revealed everything. For the first time since the selection process began, the five permanent members of the Security Council have made their opposition to the leading contenders for the UN’s top job more apparent.
Today's Essential
Author portrait
By LevantTime . - Published Oct 20, 2026 - 00:51
News feature image
Built in the 19th century, Limoges City Hall is listed as a historic monument. It was largely destroyed in an arson attack by radicalized and violent rioters, according to the authorities. (AFP)
The French government announced its first measures on Monday in response to the weekend riots in several cities across the country, starting with “partial” and “localized” curfews, even as the possibility of declaring a state of emergency was raised. President Emmanuel Macron, who is touring the Gulf states, reportedly preferred not to declare a state of emergency to avoid spooking the markets, especially since Paris had very recently announced an increase in its debt and public deficit. Political or security instability would certainly affect interest rates. The “chaos” is “confined to very specific urban areas,” Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu said. He said he had “asked prefects to impose a number of curfews tonight,” Monday, specifying that they would be “localized” and “partial.”
Economy
Author portrait
By Bernard Raymond Jabre - Published Oct 19, 2026 - 19:26
News feature image
The Peterson Foundation’s famous US national debt clock in Atlanta displays the astronomical figure of $40 trillion on September 8, 2026. (Derek White / Getty Images via AFP)
Debt is taking the blame. We watch trillions pile up in the United States, France, Italy and elsewhere in Europe, and wonder how far it can go. But debt is not the disease. It is the symptom. The disease is a budget deficit that has become permanent. We need to go back to Keynes. John Maynard Keynes never envisioned deficits as a normal, permanent feature of government. His thinking was rooted above all in the economic cycle. When the economy collapses, private investment dries up, unemployment rises, and fear paralyzes businesses and households, the state must step in. It spends, invests and accepts a temporary deficit. Monetary policy can also become more accommodative.
More Articles
Sort By: NewestOldest
Hezbollah-Israel: An Endless War in Whose Interests? (19)

This series of articles offers a clearer understanding of the current situation on the Lebanese scene in light of the recent past, steering clear of the impassioned, ideological, or romantic narratives that overlook realities and leaving readers to draw the necessary conclusions. The previous eighteen installments revisited the events surrounding Hezbollah’s rise to power, from the Taif Agreement to the beginning of its military intervention in Syria alongside Bashar al-Assad’s regime. Adopted unanimously on June 11, 2012, at a meeting of political leaders held at the Presidential Palace, the Baabda Declaration was intended to preserve Lebanon’s stability and shield it from the spillover of the Syrian civil war onto its territory.

When Terrorism Enters the Middle East Conflict…
By
Taline Becharraoui
Published

President Donald Trump's threats against Iran in the wake of Wednesday's Flydubai flight incident, along with the increased U.S. military presence in the region, show that war is a real possibility, even if the door to negotiations remains open. At least in principle, since Iranian officials continue to use radical rhetoric and believe they are in a position to dictate terms to the United States. At the same time, they are escalating matters in Yemen through their ally, the Houthis. The failed hijacking attempt—or deliberate crash—of the Emirati Flydubai aircraft operating the Dubai–Tel Aviv route, carrying more than 150 Israeli passengers on September 30, clearly dominated the past week.

Lebanon’s Impasse Calls for New Approaches

If the Lebanese authorities believe they are mobilizing all their energies and capabilities to address the new reality created by Israel’s occupation of roughly 7 percent of Lebanon’s territory, and making every possible effort to implement the framework agreement signed with Israel and revive the stalled negotiations in Rome or Washington, then they must also seek to devise some form of internal political dialogue, particularly with Hezbollah, which bears primary responsibility for drawing Lebanon into two successive wars, in 2024 and 2026. The Lebanese authorities have set the bar high since the political order was reconstituted with the election of General Joseph Aoun as President of the Republic in January 2025 and the formation of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam’s government in February of the same year. It must be acknowledged that these were goals that could scarcely even have been contemplated a few years earlier, when Hezbollah’s grip on the Lebanese state and political establishment had become deeply entrenched and its military strength had driven it to expand into Syria and become immersed in that country’s complexities and problems.

September News: The Battle of Lebanon
By
Nadim Tabet
Published

September has just come to an end and, unfortunately, I did not manage to achieve one of the goals I had set myself for the month, namely to finish a text I am currently writing on Lebanese cinema. A text shot through, among other things, with the question of what this cinema should film at a time when the country is living through a new Israeli invasion, when Lebanese society is more divided than ever, and when narratives from elsewhere about what is happening to us are already beginning to emerge. I am thinking, for example, of the film that has been announced about the pager operation, which will probably remain silent about the destruction caused by Israel in southern Lebanon and instead invite the viewer to marvel at the technical feat involved in such an operation.

The Houthis in Yemen: From Saada to Bab el-Mandeb (2)

II. Zaydism: A Doctrine of the Living Imam and Revolt A Singular Branch of Shiism Shiism ( shī‘a , “party” of Ali) regards Ali ibn Abi Talib and his descendants, the “People of the House” ( Ahl al-Bayt ), as the legitimate successors of the Prophet. Over the course of succession disputes, it split into several branches: the Twelvers, who form the majority in Iran, Iraq and Bahrain and are also strongly represented in Lebanon; the Ismailis; the so-called “extremist” currents ( ghulāt ); and the Zaydis, today concentrated in northwestern Yemen. Zaydism takes its name from Zayd ibn Ali, grandson of Hussein, who rose up against the Umayyads and died a martyr in 740. His nephew Ja‘far al-Sadiq, who would become a major reference for the future Twelvers, refused to follow him. The split occurred precisely over this point: whether to follow the imam who takes up arms against injustice, or to wait. Zayd maintained close ties with the Mu‘tazilite Wasil ibn Ata, while Abu Hanifa, founder of one of the major Sunni schools of law, studied under him and supported his revolt. This proximity explains why Zaydism has long been described as “the most Sunni of the Shiisms.”

Rich Countries, Indebted Nations
By
LevantTime .
Published

The latest increase in France’s debt illustrates a pressure shared by several major economies: borrowing is piling up while financing it is becoming more expensive. From deficits to interest rates, twelve questions to understand a phenomenon that is weighing on public budgets and citizens alike. France has crossed a new threshold. According to figures published by INSEE on September 29, its public debt stood at €3,595.5 billion at the end of the second quarter of 2026, equivalent to 119% of gross domestic product (GDP). It increased by €59.6 billion in three months. The government expects it to reach 121.7% of GDP in 2027.